
Rachel Carson's book, Silent Spring, certainly has caused the public to develop concern over the harmful effects of chemicals, including pesticides, on human health and the environment. DDT certainly has pros and cons. Unfortunately, DDT harms wildlife, including birds; therefore, it was banned in 1969. However, this chemical is the only successful pesticide in eradicating mosquitoes, vectors of disease that carry malaria. Other pesticides are available, but mosquitoes have developed resistance to them. Some people argue that DDT is the only chemical strong enough to eradicate malaria. I can understand both sides of the argument.
I read an interesting article at http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/05/rachel_carson_and_the_deaths_o.html . The author of this article believes that DDT should definitely be used and that Carson does not use legitimate scientific evidence in her book.
Also, this YouTube video is pretty cool. An economist, Richard Tren, and a researcher, Donald Roberts, wrote a book called The Excellent Powder. They advocate using DDT because of its beneficial effects in eradicating malaria. By 2017, there is supposed to be a total ban on DDT production. However, the authors argue that the benefits of DDT outweigh the harm. I am not sure who is right, the DDT advocates or the DDT opponents. It is an interesting thought though...if DDT could eradicate malaria worldwide, is it worth using it again? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXQePTscn5c





